well played, JD... well played |
For comparison, here are the prize purses for Ironman and Ironman 70.3 events in 2013:
Ironman World Championships (Hawaii)
$650K total prize purse: $120K, $60K, $40K… down to $10K for 10th
Ironman 70.3 World Championships (Vegas, with rotating international venues in future)
Ironman 70.3 World Championships (Vegas, with rotating international venues in future)
$200K total prize purse: $35K, $17.5K, $11.5K… down to $3K for 10th
Ironman Regional Championships (Melbourne, Frankfurt, Mont-Tremblant)
Ironman Regional Championships (Melbourne, Frankfurt, Mont-Tremblant)
$125K total prize purse: $25K, $12.5K, $7.5K… down to $2K for 8th
Ironman 70.3 Regional Championships (Auckland, Panama, St. George, Wiesbaden)
Ironman 70.3 Regional Championships (Auckland, Panama, St. George, Wiesbaden)
$75K total prize purse: $15K, $7.5K, $5K… down to $1K for 8th
Ironman (non-championship races)
Ironman (non-championship races)
$25-75K depending on race – for $25K: $5K, $2.75K, $1.75K… down to $750 for 6th
Ironman 70.3 (non-championship races)
Ironman 70.3 (non-championship races)
$15-50K depending on race – for $15K: $3K, $2K, $1.25K… down to $500 for 5th
To summarize, the last player to make the cut at the PGAs, in 75th place, took home the same prize money as Brent McMahon and Meredith Kessler after winning the US 70.3 Pro Championships!
It’s no secret why this disparity exists, and I’m not here to say that it’s “wrong.” It’s simple economics… people are entertained by watching experts swing a stick at a ball on the ground, to the point where such tournaments are regularly televised. Advertisers are attracted to the people watching at home, and are willing to pay a lot to reach those potential customers. This results in lots of money to go around, a chunk of which goes towards big prize money. This serves the purpose of further building the prestige (and ratings) for the event and said sponsors, and around and around it goes. If someone’s putting with $1M on the line, you stop and watch. If it’s for a hot dog, you change the channel!
in some ways you picked the wrong sport... sorry bro |
It’s no secret why this disparity exists, and I’m not here to say that it’s “wrong.” It’s simple economics… people are entertained by watching experts swing a stick at a ball on the ground, to the point where such tournaments are regularly televised. Advertisers are attracted to the people watching at home, and are willing to pay a lot to reach those potential customers. This results in lots of money to go around, a chunk of which goes towards big prize money. This serves the purpose of further building the prestige (and ratings) for the event and said sponsors, and around and around it goes. If someone’s putting with $1M on the line, you stop and watch. If it’s for a hot dog, you change the channel!
The bad news is, demand for triathlon pales in comparison to sports such as golf… triathlon is still more of a niche market than mainstream, so fewer events are covered, and advertisers are able to pay less due to fewer potential customers to reach. The end result is less money to go around.
In other promising news, additional races are now televised from time to time, and many others are available to stream on-line. Last week I watched some live coverage of Ironman Mont-Tremblant (North American Champs), which I really enjoyed. Obviously there were sponsors and advertisements associated with that event. That format will be the more immediate future of triathlon coverage, and I think has some promise. If you think pro triathletes should be paid more, tune in to the events that are currently available! Besides Kona, will triathlon coverage ever become more mainstream, similar to regular golf tournaments? Hopefully… I for one would watch, contributing a few pennies to the prize purse. Heck, I'll even buy hot dogs for the winners.
No comments:
Post a Comment